Archive for United States

Once more Henry Kissinger

Posted in economy, financial crisis, globalization, Kissinger, new order, politics, Uncategorized, world domination with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on 22/03/2009 by Walter

The secret societies that are the real power in global affairs.

An incredible audio recording of a speech made by JFK for the American Newspaper Publishers Association where he warns the press about the secret societies that are the real power in global affairs.


“The alternative to a new international order is chaos.”

By Henry A. Kissinger (International Herald Tribune), published: JANUARY 12, 2009

kissingerAs the new U.S. administration prepares to take office amid grave financial and international crises. The American prescription for a world financial order has generally been unchallenged. Now disillusionment with the United States’ management of it is widespread. Every country will seek to make itself independent, to the greatest possible degree, of the conditions that produced the collapse.

The economic world has been globalized.

The nadir of the existing international financial system coincides with simultaneous political crises around the globe. Never have so many transformations occurred at the same time in so many different parts of the world and been made globally accessible via instantaneous communication.

“The current crisis can be overcome only by developing a sense of common purpose. The alternative to a new international order is chaos.”

The financial and political crises are, in fact, closely related partly because, during the period of economic exuberance, a gap had opened up between the economic and the political organization of the world.

Not since the inauguration of President John F. Kennedy half a century ago has a new administration come into office with such a reservoir of expectations. It is unprecedented that all the principal actors on the world stage are avowing their desire to undertake the transformations imposed on them by the world crisis in collaboration with the United States.

The extraordinary impact of the president-elect on the imagination of humanity is an important element in shaping a new world order. The role of China in this new world order is equally crucial. A relationship that started on both sides as essentially a strategic design to constrain a common adversary has evolved over the decades into a pillar of the international system.

China made possible the American consumption splurge by buying American debt; America helped the modernization and reform of the Chinese economy by opening its markets to Chinese goods.

Each side of the Pacific needs the cooperation of the other in addressing the consequences of the financial crisis. Now that the global financial collapse has devastated Chinese export markets, China is emphasizing infrastructure development and domestic consumption.

America needs Chinese cooperation to address its current account imbalance and to prevent its exploding deficits from sparking a devastating inflation. What kind of global economic order arises will depend importantly on how China and America deal with each other over the next few years.

read the entire article in the: International Herald Tribune

Kissinger says an Obama presidency is a great opportunity to set up a New World Order.

in this video Henry Kissinger says:

“The president-elect is coming into office at a moment when there is upheaval in many parts of the world simultaneously… … “You have India, Pakistan; you have the jihadist movement. So he can’t really say there is one problem, that it’s the most important one. But he can give new impetus to American foreign policy partly because the reception of him is so extraordinary around the world. His task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a new world order can be created. It’s a great opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis.”

o

Kissinger is also part of the Bilderberg Group which allegedly emphasize a globalist agenda and promote the idea that the notion of national sovereignty is antiquated and regressive.

o

Chinese Vice Premier meets Henry Kissinger

kissinger-meets-chinese-vice-premierBEIJING, Jan. 13 (Xinhua) — Chinese Vice Premier Wang Qishan met Tuesday with former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger on the sidelines of celebrations marking the 30th anniversary of diplomatic ties.

Wang first paid tribute to Kissinger for his great contribution to China-U.S. relations.

“It is fair to say you are the only senior official alive who has witnessed the entire course of diplomatic relations between the two countries from the very beginning,” Wang said.

o

LA Times | Mar 21, 2009

Kissinger meets with Russians …

Russian President Dmitry Medvedev sounds optimistic about improved relations after Nixon’s secretary of State and other former high-ranking officials pay an informal visit.
Kissinger led a team of prominent former U.S. officials in meetings in Moscow this week who were acting on their own but echoing the message of cooperation from an Obama administration that has pledged to “reset” relations that have become tense in recent years. And the young Russian president, still regarded by many observers as an apprentice to Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, spoke encouragingly of efforts to end the acrimony.


“This surprising term ‘reset’ will, I hope, reflect the essence of the changes we would like to see,” Medvedev said. “We are counting on a reset. We hope it takes place.”

kissinger_primakovHis relatively passive remarks reflected the prevailing Russian contention that relations have soured because of U.S. belligerence and that the onus is on Washington to soften its behavior.

Kissinger, who also met with Putin, assured reporters that he’d found ample ground for cooperation. “I’m happy to report that the differences were not so remarkable and the agreements were considerable,” he said.

The Nixon-era secretary of State was joined on the trip by other prominent officials from previous administrations, including former Secretary of State George Shultz, former Georgia Sen. Sam Nunn, former Defense Secretary William Perry and former Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin.

The White House said the group had not been sent by President Obama. “They’re private citizens and not there at the behest of the White House,” said an official, speaking on condition of anonymity. “But they did inform the White House beforehand.”

A foreign policy realist, Kissinger is an advocate of finding accommodation with the Russians and setting aside tensions that sharpened during George W. Bush’s presidency.

The tensions have raised anticipation for a meeting between Obama and Medvedev on the sidelines of next month’s G-20 summit in London. On Friday, Medvedev said he was looking forward to the encounter.

“Many issues have accumulated in recent years that should be discussed,” he said.

signs of resistance against economical world domination

Posted in economy, financial crisis, history, politics with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on 23/11/2008 by Walter

United States and Great Britain will have to give up power and influence

USA-POLITICS“Redesigning the global financial system is a historic challenge, and not one that can depend on the results of a single conference.” In addition to the larger philosophical differences, there are also a number of disagreements when it comes to the finer points of any possible financial system reform. The responsible s of the financial crash should intent to use financial market reforms and the necessary injection of governmental money resources for their own proposals to eliminate competitors and reestablish dominant positions in the new global economic system.

“Globalization, though, makes such a reform more difficult. … Experience from the first worldwide trade negotiations shows that it takes a long time. After a decade of talks, the world is still waiting for the first global trade agreement.”

“A larger obstacle on the way to a new financial architecture is the role played by the US and Great Britain. They will have to give up power and influence. If the state seeks more control and if the finance houses and their managers have to take on more responsibility, then profits will by necessity be lower.

In 2007, 40 percent of all company profits came in the finance sector. But the price bubble in real estate and on the stock markets can grow no further — and the dreams of wealth held by many Americans and British will have to be abandoned. Herein lies the problem. Many lived well from the bloated financial sector, and Britain and America both gained tax revenues and international influence.

“Shrinking the US financial sector would cost Obama, the next American president, plenty of strength and would require a large dose of courage. Many of his advisors from the economic establishment are warning to tread lightly. … But the time for unilateralism has come to an end. The only thing left for the US is to accept this unsavory piece of news.”

“Give me control of a nation’s money and I don’t care who makes her laws”

by Meyer Amchel Rothschild (1743-1812)

bank-of-englandGreat Britain followed an especially aggressive policy of slack oversight in order to establish the City of London as a financial center. The British Empire is generally considered to have arisen as a result of Britain’s trade objectives. Since centuries the British tried with excellent results to monopolize the exploitation of colonies resources by implanting a domination of the “new worlds” money and financial system. For to liberate from social and governmental responsibilities the British dissolved their empire, but not their financial octopus. Invading the international financial system they used globalization and free-market principles for to absorb and manipulate national influences and generate high enough returns to remain their competition and leadership on the international stage.

The Bank of England’s strategy was to completely control the British Government. Then they could apply pressure on the colonies and force them to rebel. Lastly, they would impose a Bank of England type bank on the Colonies. This they did in the year 1791. It was called the Bank of the “U.S.” General Jackson refused to renew the bank charter and he died an unnatural death in 1836. The corrupt bank was re-chartered in 1913 under the name “Federal” Reserve Bank of the “U.S.”

The Federal Reserve Bank is a consortium of twelve private banks which are not part of the United States Government.

These private banks purchase paper notes from the U.S. mint for printing cost or simply enter digital money into their computer then lend back the money plus interest to the people through member banks.  The profits go into the share holders of the bank’s pocket’s, the U.S. public receives no benefit.

The Primary Owners of the Federal Reserve Bank Are:
1. Rothschild’s of London and Berlin
2. Lazard Brothers of Paris
3. Israel Moses Seaf of Italy
4. Kuhn, Loeb & Co. of Germany and New York
5. Warburg & Company of Hamburg, Germany
6. Lehman Brothers of New York
7. Goldman, Sachs of New York
8. Rockefeller Brothers of New York

fedAll the primary owners are branches of European establishments.  Foreigners, almost entirely Jewish, control the United States Money supply.  They literally own exclusive rights to the dollar and simply enter dollars into their banks books to make money which they then lend back to us at a profit.

In 1913 in exchange for paying for his Presidential campaign, President Woodrow Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act handing over the U.S. currency to twelve regional private banks.  In 1933 Roosevelt confiscated citizens gold and handed it to these private banks.

The bank is supposed to bring stability to the economy, however, almost every major marked crash and war can be attributed to the Federal Reserve Bank, including the Great Depression, World War I, World War II, the Gulf War etc.

The privately held Federal Reserve Bank has not once been audited and never pays any income tax on their astonishing income.

According to Congressional record the U.S. Government can buy back the FED at any time for $450 million.  That’s about half the amount of money we pay them daily.

As of March 6, 2006, the national debt stands at 8.2 trillion dollars. The American taxpayers have paid the FED banking system $173,875,979,369.66 in interest on that debt in just five short months, from October, 2005, through February, 2006.

The Fed allows Congress to spend all they want that’s why your Congressperson does nothing.

read more in: Liberty for Live

the Rockefellers and the Council on Foreign Relations

Posted in economy, history, politics with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on 16/11/2008 by Walter

the Rockefellers, the Council on Foreign Relations and the change of United States

It is true that the Americans have ”free elections,” in which they have the absolute right to vote for one of two opposing candidates, both of whom have been handpicked and financed by the Rockefeller syndicate and too they are free to invest in a stock market in which the daily quantity, price and value of the monetary unit is manipulated and controlled by a Federal Reserve System which is answerable only to the Bank of England.

Investigators from the network of U.S. funding cautioned against excessive expectations with the elected president of this country, Barack Obama, whom they described as the chosen today of the great capitals. Obama was the largest recipient of donations in the campaign. Part of this capital coming from the same network of capital that has financed the previous U.S. presidents, including key advisers as Zbigniew Brzezinski.

brzezinski_bin_laden_aka_tim_osmanThe book ¨the imperial spider web¨ of Golinger and the French sociologist Roman Migus qualifies favor of Brzezinski’s “soft power”, the psychological and economic warfare, covert actions, separatism and techniques of soft coup rather than military operations. The book describes Brzezinski, a Polish nationalized U.S. as the creator and financier of the group Al Qaeda to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan in the late 70s of last century. He is a member of the think tanks (think tanks) more important as the Center for Strategic and International Studies and Council on Foreign Relations and a member of the board of the International Crisis Group.

His preference for soft interventionism placed him as an informal adviser to Obama’s opposition to the administration of George W. Bush.

Brzezinski is identified as a close friend of the Rockefeller family and co-founder of the Trilateral Commission, a plan for world domination.

The Brzezinski – Obama Axis

barack-obama-2008It was reported in the New York Sun on February 15 that Barack Hussain Obama has chosen Zbigniew Brzezinski to advise him on Middle East policy. An Obama-Brzezinski axis has revolutionary significance. It might accelerate the de-Americanization and decline of the United States.

With Zbigniew Brzezinski as his national security adviser, it was Jimmy Carter who facilitated the return of Ayatollah Khomeini to Iran. The Carter-Brzezinski axis is very much responsible for the Islamic revolution—the most dangerous revolution that has occurred in human history, a revolution that threatens the existence of every nation-state.

With Brzezinski advising him, Obama’s chance about CHANGE may be more serious. He may have in mind changing the fundamental character of the American regime. That would fit well with the designs of one of his backers, billionaire George Soros, a globalist committed to the termination of the nation-state and the ascendancy of world government.

george-sorosCurrently, Soros is chairman of Soros Fund Management and the Open Society Institute and is also a former member of the Board of Directors of the Council on Foreign Relations. He is known for having donated large sums of money in a failed effort to defeat President George W. Bush’s bid for re-election in 2004. He supported Democrat Barack Obama in the 2008 U.S. presidential election.

contracted to bust the stocks

The Trilateral Commission is a private organization, established to foster closer cooperation between America, Europe and Japan. It was founded in July 1973, at the initiative of David Rockefeller; who was Chairman of the Council on Foreign Relations at that time. The Trilateral Commission is widely seen as a counterpart to the Council on Foreign Relations.

Speaking at the Chase Manhattan International Financial Forums in London, Brussels, Montreal, and Paris, Rockefeller proposed the creation of an International Commission of Peace and Prosperity in early 1972 (which would later become the Trilateral Commission). At the 1972 Bilderberg meeting, the idea was widely accepted, but elsewhere, it got a cool reception. According to Rockefeller, the organization could “be of help to government by providing measured judgment.”

“Close Trilateral cooperation in keeping the peace, in managing the world economy, and in fostering economic development and in alleviating world poverty, will improve the chances of a smooth and peaceful evolution of the global system.”

President Jimmy Carter appointed 26 former Commission members to senior positions in his Administration. Later it was revealed that Carter himself was a former Trilateral member.
Active or former members of the Trilateral Commission now head every key agency involved in mapping U.S. strategy for dealing with the rest of the world.”

Among them: George Soros, Chairman, Soros Fund Management LLC, New York, NY; Chairman, The Open Society Institute and John D. Rockefeller IV, Member (D-WV), U.S. Senate


Control oil and you control nations, control food and you control the people

Posted in american dream, Colonialism, economy, financial crisis, globalization, health, history, Kissinger, new order, politics, world domination with tags , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , on 10/11/2008 by Walter

The ultimate goal of Henry Kissinger, the “hired hand” of Rockefeller dynasty.

America’s post-world war II dominance rests on two pillars and one commodity – unchallengeable military power and the dollar as the world’s reserve currency combined with the quest to control global oil and other energy resources.

economic-powerIn the midst of a worldwide drought and stock market collapse, consider Henry Kissinger’s classified memo in April, 1974. It was on a secret project called National Security Study Memorandum 200 (NSSM 200) that was shaped by Rockefeller interests and aimed to adopt a “world population plan of action” for drastic global population control – meaning to reduce it. The US led the effort, and it worked like this – it made birth control in developing countries a prerequisite for US aid. Engdahl summed it up in blunt terms: “if these inferior races get in the way of our securing ample, cheap raw materials, then we must find ways to get rid of them.”

UN Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) reporting sharply higher food prices along with severe shortages, and warned this condition is extreme, unprecedented and threatens billions with hunger and starvation. Prices are up 40% this year after a 9% rise in 2006, and it forced developing states to pay 25% more for imported food and be unable to afford enough of it.

american-dreamVarious explanations for the problem are cited that include growing demand, higher fuel and transportation costs, commodity speculation, the use of corn for ethanol production (taking one-third of the harvest that’s more than what’s exported for food) and extreme weather while ignoring the above implications – the power of agribusiness to manipulate supply for greater profits and “cull the herd” in targeted Third World countries. Affected ones are poor, and FAO cites 20 in Africa, 9 in Asia, 6 in Latin America and 2 in Eastern Europe that in total represent 850 million endangered people now suffering from chronic hunger and related poverty. They depend on imports, and their diets rely heavily on the type grains agribusiness controls – wheat, corn and rice plus soybeans. If current prices stay high and shortages persist, millions will die – maybe by design.

exxon-dessert-eagleUnder the banner of the United Nations, the new Bretton Woods framework, the IMF, World Bank and the GATT, were established for one purpose – to integrate the developing world into the US-dominated Global North so its wealth could be transfered to powerful business interests, mostly in the US.

So far, Washington and the industry are on a roll toward controlling oil and food. The pursuit was ongoing with little public knowledge of how far advanced things are and how reckless the scheme is – to genetically engineer all plants and life forms and to control world population by culling its “unwanted” parts. Hundreds of millions around the world stand opposed, but it’s unclear if that’s enough.

Big Banks controlling the Federal Reserve and our money (dollar), Big Oil our world energy resources, Big Media our information, Big Pharma our health, Big Technology our state-of-the-art everything and watching us, Big Defense our wars, Big Pentagon waging them, and other corporate predators exploiting our lives for profit.

written by F. William Engdahl, a review from Stephen Lendman

Study Confirms Genetically Modified Corn Threaten Human Health and Fertility

pregnant-womanA long-term feeding study commissioned by the Austrian Agency for Health and Food Safety, managed by the Austrian Federal Ministry of Health, Family and Youth, and carried out by Veterinary University Vienna, confirms genetically modified (GM) corn seriously affects reproductive health in mice. Non-GMO advocates, who have warned about this infertility link along with other health risks, now seek an immediate ban of all GM foods and GM crops to protect the health of humankind and the fertility of women around the world.

Feeding mice with genetically modified corn developed by the US-based Monsanto Corporation led to lower fertility and body weight, according to the study conducted by the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna. Lead author of the study Professor Zentek said, there was a direct link between the decrease in fertility and the GM diet, and that mice fed with non-GE corn reproduced more efficiently.

America is losing its superpower status in the global system

irak-war-victimsIn 2008 appeared some obstacles which produced big interruptions in the enlargement of  American power and it seems that this plan is doomed to failure. The Financial Crisis of 2008 bankrupted the American economic system and the dollar is loosing value, the big banks are crashing, the oil price is sinking, the wars in Irak and Afghanistan are complicating without possibility to win them ….. promising to initiate a big change Obama is elected new president in the United States …..

Gorbachev s russian Perestroika finished the cold war. Barack Obama s Perestroika will finish the economical war for Americans domination.

The new crisis affecting the global financial system based on parasitic speculation and usury is a terminal crisis. It can no longer be solved through purely financial and monetary mechanisms and measures. If US authorities only concentrate on this type of measure, then a truly serious collapse is imminent and unavoidable.

finances, energy and food in crisis

For the first time in modern economic times, three major crises – affecting finances, energy and food – are coinciding, coming together and merging. Each interacts with the others, exponentially worsening the deterioration of the real economy.

As much as the authorities try to minimize the seriousness of the moment, the truth is that we are facing an economic cataclysm of unprecedented magnitude, whose social effects are just beginning to be felt and will explode with total brutality in the next several months.

From financial crisis we have gone on to a social crisis. And the authoritarian policies emerge again. The European Parliament on June 18 approved the infamous “directive of return,” and the Spanish authorities have announced their willingness to arrange for the eviction from Spain of one million foreign workers.

On top of this awful situation comes the third oil shock, as the price of a barrel of crude rises to about US$140. That is an irrational increase (in 1998, a barrel cost less than US$10), due not only to an excessive demand but, above all, to the action of many speculators who are betting on the continuing rise of a fuel on its way to extinction.

As if this whole context were not gloomy enough, the food crisis has suddenly worsened, reminding us that the specter of hunger continues to threaten almost 1 billion people. In about 40 countries, the high cost of food has provoked uprisings and general revolts. The summit of the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), held June 5 in Rome to consider alimentary security, could not reach an agreement to relaunch worldwide food production. Here, too, speculators fleeing from the financial disaster are partly responsible, because they”re betting on a high price of future harvests. So even agriculture is being financialized.

la-cumbre-del-g-20

The big emerging countries, who now lead the global growth want to enter the closed club of rich countries and become full partners in the conduct of economic issues on the planet. This club is dominated by the largest world economies Britain, Canada, France, Germany, Japan, Italy, United States and the European Union.  In the group of G 20 this nations include 12 emerging nations: Brazil, Russia, India, China, Argentina, Australia, Indonesia, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, South Africa, South Korea and Turkey.

In the heat of the financial storm that is shaking the most advanced economies, Brazil, Russia, India and China (BRIC group called by its acronym) do not want to settle for a seat in the second category of the G20 summit convened to discuss the crisis.

Those four nations had a “call to reforming multilateral institutions to reflect structural changes in the global economy” and also demonstrate “the central role that emerging markets are now playing.”